Scotland’s First Minister, John Swinney, has confirmed that the Scottish government may introduce buffer zones around hotels that accommodate asylum seekers. This follows protests outside a hotel in Perth and similar demonstrations across the UK.
The discussion comes amid heightened concern over safety and intimidation at asylum accommodation sites. Swinney described the recent Perth protest as “a really ugly set of events.” He noted it took place within his own constituency and involved conduct that caused distress to others.
Legal Context And Precedent For Buffer Zones
In 2024, the Scottish Parliament passed legislation introducing 200-metre buffer zones around abortion clinics to prevent harassment and intimidation of patients and staff. This law has since been cited as a possible model for addressing protests outside asylum hotels, suggesting that similar zones could impose restrictions on the proximity of protests to reduce the risk of harassment for vulnerable groups.
Swinney acknowledged that the right to protest is fundamental in a democratic society, but stressed that this right does not extend to behaviour that threatens or intimidates others. He confirmed that suggestions from SNP MP Pete Wishart to explore buffer zones around asylum hotels are under active consideration and could result in legal changes that regulate where protests may occur to enhance asylum seekers’ protection.
The proposal has drawn criticism from the Scottish Conservatives, who argue that buffer zones around asylum hotels could undermine freedom of expression and risk escalating tensions rather than resolving them. Murdo Fraser, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, said peaceful protest must be protected, but intimidation is unacceptable. Critics caution that adopting buffer zones in this context could set a precedent for restricting protest rights elsewhere.
Fraser cautioned against introducing new protest laws in response to specific incidents. He warned such measures could take years to implement and may have unintended consequences for civil liberties. He argued for greater support for Police Scotland and stronger community engagement.
Policing Response To Perth Protest
Ahead of a protest in Perth on 10 January, Police Scotland confirmed that a “proportionate policing plan” would be in place to maintain order and safety. Officers reported no arrests during the demonstration. However, investigations into reported incidents remain ongoing.
The Perth protest is part of a broader pattern of demonstrations outside asylum hotels across the UK. These protests intensified last summer. They first emerged in Epping, Essex, after the arrest of a hotel resident, who was later convicted of sexual offences.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage referenced the Epping case when criticising UK immigration policies. He described them as a “total failure” and said current arrangements have eroded public confidence. While condemning violence, Farage said buffer zones might be justified if necessary. He questioned whether buffer zones address the underlying issues driving public anger.
In Scotland, smaller protests have taken place outside asylum hotels in places such as Aberdeenshire and Falkirk. Some demonstrations raised serious concern after reports of extremist gestures and threatening banners. These incidents prompted condemnation from local leaders and police.
At the UK level, the government has pledged to reform the asylum system and reduce illegal migration. Proposals announced by the Home Secretary in November include extending the qualifying period for permanent settlement to 20 years for most asylum seekers and increasing the frequency of refugee status reviews from 5 years to 2.5 years.
Key Takeaway
The Scottish government is actively considering buffer zones around asylum hotels following protests that raised concerns about safety and intimidation. While ministers argue such measures could protect vulnerable residents, critics warn of potential impacts on free speech, highlighting a growing policy tension between public order, civil liberties, and asylum accommodation reform.
Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!

































