A coalition of international and Japanese civil society organizations issued an urgent joint letter to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, calling for a fundamental shift in how Japan integrates human rights into its foreign, trade, and economic security policies. The letter outlines concrete legislative and policy reforms to align Japan’s global economic strategy with international human rights standards, while addressing widening accountability gaps in global supply chains and in information access.
Appeal arrives amid growing global concern that economic security frameworks are increasingly detached from human rights obligations. As authoritarian governance expands and donor support for civil society contracts, signatories argue that Japan occupies a rare position to provide principled leadership.
Mandatory Due Diligence As A Policy Imperative
The central demand of the letter is to introduce legally binding human rights and environmental due diligence requirements for companies operating within Japan’s jurisdiction, including across global value chains. The current Japanese guidelines, issued in 2022, remain voluntary, leaving enforcement to corporate discretion rather than law.
Global evidence demonstrates that non-binding frameworks fail to prevent forced labor, child labor, unsafe working conditions, and retaliation against workers. European Union legislative efforts on corporate sustainability due diligence illustrate an emerging international norm that holds companies legally responsible for identifying, preventing, and remedying abuses linked to their operations.
Failure to adopt comparable measures risks positioning Japan as a weak link in rights protection, while simultaneously undermining the long-term resilience of its own supply chains.
The letter urges Japan to support import and export bans on goods produced through forced labor, aligning trade policy with international labor standards. Forced labor remains prevalent in multiple regions, often embedded deep within complex supply networks that supply advanced economies.
Trade restrictions tied to human rights compliance serve not only as accountability tools but as safeguards against reputational, legal, and economic risk. Without such mechanisms, economic security strategies risk enabling abusive practices that contradict Japan’s stated commitments to democracy and the rule of law.
Shrinking Civic Space And Information Gaps
Signatories highlight a growing crisis in access to reliable information due to repression of journalists, researchers, and civil society actors in authoritarian states. Independent media and watchdog organizations often operate under surveillance, threat, or in exile, yet remain essential sources for understanding human rights abuses, corruption, and humanitarian crises.
Recent reductions in foreign aid by major donor governments have significantly weakened these organizations. Japan, despite relying on its research for policymaking, has not established mechanisms to support it financially. The letter argues this disconnect undermines evidence-based foreign policy and weakens democratic resilience.
Call to action includes direct funding for independent media and civil society organizations, particularly those operating in exile or under threat. Supporting fact-finding and accountability initiatives is framed not as charity but as strategic infrastructure for informed policy decisions.
International human rights bodies have consistently affirmed the role of free expression and independent journalism as cornerstones of democratic governance. Protecting these functions abroad reinforces Japan’s own security interests by ensuring access to accurate, on-the-ground information.
Global Leadership Vacuum And Japan’s Role
The letter situates the appeal within a broader geopolitical context marked by declining leadership from traditional rights advocates. Cuts to foreign assistance and retreat from rights-based diplomacy have created a vacuum at a time when repression is intensifying worldwide.
Japan’s constitutional protections for freedom of expression, combined with its economic influence and regional standing, position it to lead a human rights-centered approach to economic security. Doing so would strengthen alliances, enhance corporate competitiveness, and reinforce international norms increasingly under strain.
Organizations behind the letter emphasize that human rights integration is not an abstract moral stance but a practical policy choice. Legal accountability, transparent supply chains, and reliable information ecosystems contribute directly to stable markets and credible diplomacy.
Without decisive reform, Japan risks adopting an economic security framework that prioritizes short-term resilience while neglecting the structural abuses that destabilize societies and economies over time.
Key Takeaways
- Civil society groups urge Japan to embed human rights into its foreign and economic security policy.
- Mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence remains absent in Japanese law.
- Forced labor linked to global supply chains demands enforceable trade controls.
- Independent media and civil society face collapse due to shrinking international funding.
- Accurate information is essential for credible foreign policy decision-making.
- Japan holds strategic capacity to fill a growing global human rights leadership gap.
Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
